The Uncertain Future of AAA Licensed Games After Star Wars Outlaws

Star Wars Outlaws' disappointing launch impacts licensed AAA titles, highlighting industry reliance on safe franchises over innovative new IPs and risking future creativity.

I still remember the excitement I felt when Star Wars Outlaws was first announced. As a lifelong Star Wars fan and avid gamer, the promise of an open-world adventure in that beloved galaxy far, far away seemed like a dream come true. Fast forward to 2025, and the landscape looks dramatically different. The rumors swirling around the industry suggest that Ubisoft may have axed plans for a Star Wars Outlaws sequel, and honestly, I'm not shocked—just disappointed.

The game's underwhelming sales and lukewarm critical reception have created ripples throughout the gaming industry that might affect how major studios approach licensed AAA titles in the future. I've spent countless hours exploring Kay Vess's adventure, and while I enjoyed many aspects of the game, I couldn't help but notice the technical issues and missed opportunities that plagued its launch.

the-uncertain-future-of-aaa-licensed-games-after-star-wars-outlaws-image-0

The Domino Effect on Licensed Games

Ubisoft hasn't officially confirmed the cancellation yet, but the writing seems to be on the wall. The company blamed poor sales on early bugs and—get this—a "struggling overall image of the IP." As if Star Wars isn't one of the most recognizable franchises on the planet! Talk about passing the buck.

What worries me most is how this might influence other publishers. When a gaming giant like Ubisoft can't make a Star Wars game profitable enough to warrant a sequel, smaller studios will likely think twice before taking on licensed properties. We've already seen similar situations with recent DC Comics games that flopped despite their massive built-in fanbases.

Back to the Safe Harbor

Meanwhile, Ubisoft has been proudly touting the success of Assassin's Creed Shadows, their latest entry in a franchise that's been running since I was in middle school. The contrast couldn't be more stark—Outlaws gets the cold shoulder while Assassin's Creed receives a warm embrace despite its massive development budget.

This pattern feels all too familiar in the industry. When companies face financial disappointment, they retreat to what they perceive as safe choices. For Ubisoft, that means potentially abandoning innovative licensed games to double down on their established franchises like Assassin's Creed and Far Cry. These series have delivered reliable profits for years, even if recent entries have received mixed reviews from critics and players alike.

The Innovation Paradox

There's a bitter irony here that I can't ignore. For years, I've seen gamers (myself included) complain about the industry's reliance on annual releases of familiar franchises:

  • "Another Call of Duty? Come on!"

  • "Is this the 20th FIFA game already?"

  • "How many Assassin's Creed games do we need?"

Yet when companies take risks with new IPs or licensed properties and those games underperform, they naturally retreat to their cash cows. I'm left wondering: where's the balance? How can we encourage innovation while ensuring these ambitious projects succeed commercially?

The Star Wars Outlaws situation exemplifies this paradox perfectly. Fans wanted something fresh in the Star Wars gaming universe, but when Ubisoft delivered a flawed but ambitious title, not enough people showed up with their wallets open.

The Ripple Effect Across the Industry

If Ubisoft truly cancels plans for an Outlaws sequel, the decision won't exist in isolation. Other major publishers will take note. EA, which holds the exclusive rights to develop Star Wars games, might reconsider its approach to the franchise. Warner Bros. might rethink its strategy for DC Comics games. The entire landscape of licensed AAA games could shift toward safer, more conservative designs.

This potential industry-wide retreat from creative risk-taking with beloved franchises would be a tremendous loss for gamers. Some of the most memorable gaming experiences have come from developers taking chances with established IPs—think Batman: Arkham Asylum or Star Wars: Knights of the Old Republic.

A Personal Reflection

I've spent over two decades playing video games, and the cyclical nature of the industry has become increasingly apparent. We're currently in a period where financial pressures and shareholder expectations often override creative ambition. The potential cancellation of a Star Wars Outlaws sequel is just one symptom of this larger trend.

Don't get me wrong—I understand why companies make these decisions. Game development costs have skyrocketed in the past decade, and the financial risks are enormous. When a game with the Star Wars name attached can't meet sales projections, that sends shockwaves through boardrooms across the industry.

But as a player who values new experiences and creative approaches to familiar worlds, I can't help but feel like we're all losing something valuable when publishers retreat to their comfort zones.

People Also Ask

Why did Star Wars Outlaws underperform?

While Ubisoft cited early bugs and issues with the Star Wars brand, the reality is more complex. The game launched with technical problems that hurt initial impressions, received mixed reviews from critics, and faced stiff competition in a crowded release window. Additionally, some players felt the gameplay didn't fully deliver on the promise of a Star Wars outlaw fantasy.

Will there be more Star Wars games in the future?

Absolutely! Despite Outlaws' disappointing performance, EA still holds rights to develop Star Wars games, and other studios like Quantic Dream have Star Wars projects in development. The franchise remains incredibly valuable in gaming—Outlaws' struggles reflect more on execution than on the viability of Star Wars as a gaming property.

Are licensed games inherently riskier than original IPs?

Not necessarily. Licensed games come with built-in audiences, which can be an advantage. However, they also come with higher expectations, licensing costs, and creative constraints. The risk profile is different rather than inherently higher—success depends largely on execution and alignment with fan expectations.

FAQ

Q: Could Star Wars Outlaws still get a sequel despite the rumors?

A: It's possible but unlikely. If the game failed to meet Ubisoft's financial projections, allocating resources to a sequel would be difficult to justify to shareholders. However, gaming's landscape changes quickly, and a dedicated fan community could potentially influence future decisions.

Q: What lessons should developers take from Star Wars Outlaws?

A: Licensed games need to nail both technical execution and the fantasy fulfillment fans expect. Launching with bugs is particularly damaging when working with beloved IPs, as disappointed fans are vocal. Also, understanding what aspects of an IP resonate most with fans is crucial.

Q: Will we see fewer AAA licensed games in the future?

A: We might see a temporary pullback, but licensed games aren't going anywhere. However, publishers may approach them more cautiously, possibly focusing on established game formulas rather than experimental approaches. The pendulum will likely swing back eventually as successful licensed games emerge.

Q: As a fan, how can I support the kinds of games I want to see?

A: Vote with your wallet by purchasing games that align with your values, particularly at launch when sales figures matter most. Engage positively with developers on social media, provide constructive feedback, and participate in beta tests when available. The gaming industry does listen—it just sometimes takes time to see the results.